From cab61b88e09bebfc249701a09d456ad1372578e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yarikoptic Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:23:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_15_b120af2367cc3667934c088b496331f6._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/registerurl__58___do_changes_in_journal___34__in_place__34____63__/comment_15_b120af2367cc3667934c088b496331f6._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/registerurl__58___do_changes_in_journal___34__in_place__34____63__/comment_15_b120af2367cc3667934c088b496331f6._comment b/doc/todo/registerurl__58___do_changes_in_journal___34__in_place__34____63__/comment_15_b120af2367cc3667934c088b496331f6._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..880abf666f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/registerurl__58___do_changes_in_journal___34__in_place__34____63__/comment_15_b120af2367cc3667934c088b496331f6._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="yarikoptic" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4" + subject="comment 15" + date="2022-07-18T19:23:01Z" + content=""" +I was not thinking about interrupts but more about running `whereis` and the `registerurl --batch` at the same time -- i.e. would `whereis` have up-to-date information about the most recent `registerurl` added url? Although may be in our particular case that particular `whereis + registerurl` would not be used. +"""]] -- 2.30.2