From c12799b1017b43c7c1b5073b147495b3d3ffda5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:12:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...nt_1_30217e593a04cefa30619025d0a58108._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/How_can_I_determine_why_a_given_file_is___34__used__34____63__/comment_1_30217e593a04cefa30619025d0a58108._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/How_can_I_determine_why_a_given_file_is___34__used__34____63__/comment_1_30217e593a04cefa30619025d0a58108._comment b/doc/forum/How_can_I_determine_why_a_given_file_is___34__used__34____63__/comment_1_30217e593a04cefa30619025d0a58108._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..979211ee7b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/How_can_I_determine_why_a_given_file_is___34__used__34____63__/comment_1_30217e593a04cefa30619025d0a58108._comment @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2021-05-10T19:04:00Z" + content=""" +Is it in use in git's index? git-annex addunused adds a link to the working +tree, and also stages it in the index. You said +"I rm'ed the symlink", but that would leave it in the index, so still used. + +(It's also theoretically possible for git-annex unused to incorrectly +decide something is unused that is not -- it uses a bloom filter which can +have false positives -- but this is highly unlikely unless your repo has +a huge number of files in it. The annex.bloomaccuracy and annex.bloomaccuracy +configs can be used to tweak the bloom filter.) +"""]] -- 2.30.2