From bee99dc1a40678647eebe50dee0910ade6efb15d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: imlew Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:56:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...2_77cd7b20abd0cd1eadee0ebeb186b3cf._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_12_77cd7b20abd0cd1eadee0ebeb186b3cf._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_12_77cd7b20abd0cd1eadee0ebeb186b3cf._comment b/doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_12_77cd7b20abd0cd1eadee0ebeb186b3cf._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e99a4e1093 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_12_77cd7b20abd0cd1eadee0ebeb186b3cf._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="imlew" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/23858c3eed3c3ea9e21522f4c999f1ed" + subject="comment 12" + date="2023-12-12T11:56:05Z" + content=""" +Hi joey, + +if it was slow because the inodes changed it should only be slow the first time `git status` etc are run. +What I experienced was that it got slower the more files were in the repo whie the drive was continuously connected. + + +Thanks for your suggestion to use a directory special remote, but it's not clear to me how that would be an improvement over a bare repo. +The only drawback to using a bare repo is the lack of a working tree and special remotes don't seem to have that either. + + + +"""]] -- 2.30.2