From b4f2de9cba42ebe55b1e90e1cb87c83306835723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Hutchings Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 01:37:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fanotify: Taint on use of FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS Various free and proprietary AV products use this feature and users apparently want it. But punting access checks to userland seems like an easy way to deadlock the system, and there will be nothing we can do about that. So warn and taint the kernel if this feature is actually used. Gbp-Pq: Topic debian Gbp-Pq: Name fanotify-taint-on-use-of-fanotify_access_permissions.patch --- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c index 7ebfca6a1427..f9a3cb218a97 100644 --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c @@ -858,6 +858,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(fanotify_mark, int, fanotify_fd, unsigned int, flags, #endif return -EINVAL; +#ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS + if (mask & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS) { + pr_warn_once("%s (%d): Using fanotify permission checks may lead to deadlock; tainting kernel\n", + current->comm, current->pid); + add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); + } +#endif + f = fdget(fanotify_fd); if (unlikely(!f.file)) return -EBADF; -- 2.30.2