From 686907ea2f9f630dc3e5ea5ef4026d016e1b85da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 21:24:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_3_39c729fc2ea4b597d13e54d60bb36d0d._comment | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/devblog/day_418__concurrent_externals/comment_3_39c729fc2ea4b597d13e54d60bb36d0d._comment diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_418__concurrent_externals/comment_3_39c729fc2ea4b597d13e54d60bb36d0d._comment b/doc/devblog/day_418__concurrent_externals/comment_3_39c729fc2ea4b597d13e54d60bb36d0d._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7f4202ab9c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/devblog/day_418__concurrent_externals/comment_3_39c729fc2ea4b597d13e54d60bb36d0d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Adam" + subject="comment 3" + date="2016-10-04T21:24:50Z" + content=""" +Oh, I see, thanks. Have you thought about adding an option for that to the assistant? For example, I tested syncing a bunch of text files through a special remote, and even though the files were small, the per-command latency added up, so the effective transfer rate wasn't very high. If it were easy to set the concurrency option in the assistant, I guess it would help with that. +"""]] -- 2.30.2