From 488ffce6409db07775bf7d093395aee257f01312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: imlew Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 13:36:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...mment_14_6487a9a170f7caa7c9db06ac3bee8c0e._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_14_6487a9a170f7caa7c9db06ac3bee8c0e._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_14_6487a9a170f7caa7c9db06ac3bee8c0e._comment b/doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_14_6487a9a170f7caa7c9db06ac3bee8c0e._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..47e1d68d76 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/very_slow_on_exfat_drives/comment_14_6487a9a170f7caa7c9db06ac3bee8c0e._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="imlew" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/23858c3eed3c3ea9e21522f4c999f1ed" + subject="comment 14" + date="2023-12-12T13:36:20Z" + content=""" +The speeds reported by `get` and `copy` were similar to what `rsync` reports when I just copy files to and from the disks. +It was really just the work tree (and I guess the clean/smudge filters) being slow. + +And bare repos have the advantage that they carry for metadata and possibly file history. +"""]] -- 2.30.2