From 2777e51ee894074f33cb6c6a9e3a778b37f45d20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:24:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment diff --git a/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment b/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a2284c3e1c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 7" + date="2013-04-02T21:24:06Z" + content=""" +`bup-split` uses a git branch to name the objects stored in the bup repository. So it will be limited by any scalability issues affecting large numbers of git branches. I don't know what those are. + +Yes, it would be possible to make git-annex store this in the git-annex branch instead. +"""]] -- 2.30.2