From 1cd8160a30ab8007d483327f73dab9f0c998cc94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:30:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use 'timer='delay_for_missed_ticks' The assertion only allows values of 1 (no_delay_for_missed_ticks) up to 3 (one_missed_tick_pending). It should be possible to use the value of 0 (delay_for_missed_ticks) for the timer configuration option. Acked-by: Ian Campbell Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk --- tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c index e1cd9a4b2b..de555eedd9 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ out: static unsigned long timer_mode(const libxl_domain_build_info *info) { const libxl_timer_mode mode = info->u.hvm.timer_mode; - assert(mode != LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && + assert(mode >= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && mode <= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_ONE_MISSED_TICK_PENDING); return ((unsigned long)mode); } -- 2.30.2