From 142be243349c18e270f898d3724e6832bfce8e16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:52:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] update --- ...ment_6_c75c9bcbcc8e68c60323dfde9c0248a7._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Build__47__OSXMkLibs.hs_does_not_resolve___64__loader__95__path/comment_6_c75c9bcbcc8e68c60323dfde9c0248a7._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Build__47__OSXMkLibs.hs_does_not_resolve___64__loader__95__path/comment_6_c75c9bcbcc8e68c60323dfde9c0248a7._comment b/doc/bugs/Build__47__OSXMkLibs.hs_does_not_resolve___64__loader__95__path/comment_6_c75c9bcbcc8e68c60323dfde9c0248a7._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3b309045d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Build__47__OSXMkLibs.hs_does_not_resolve___64__loader__95__path/comment_6_c75c9bcbcc8e68c60323dfde9c0248a7._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 6""" + date="2020-12-29T16:49:52Z" + content=""" +I later removed `USE_SYSTEM_LIBS` and made it skip +`@loader_path` as it was already skipping `@executable_path`. + +Looks like the OSX build is succeeding with building and using the +app. I suppose this can probably be closed, although we don't know how +portable that app might be to systems where the libraries this causes it to +skip are at other versions than it needs. +"""]] -- 2.30.2