From 10fcd619665f3b5579b2fef8c1dac2bdf4a2b595 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 16:40:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix format --- .../comment_5_ea2368e228753931099084e634c7bbca._comment | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_5_ea2368e228753931099084e634c7bbca._comment b/doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_5_ea2368e228753931099084e634c7bbca._comment index c2353a4f68..5e64d78dc2 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_5_ea2368e228753931099084e634c7bbca._comment +++ b/doc/bugs/35_failed_tests_on_beegfs/comment_5_ea2368e228753931099084e634c7bbca._comment @@ -65,4 +65,4 @@ I don't care a great deal about supporting Beegfs; it would be nice to support it in some of its less crazy configurations if possible. But not leaking FDs while running child processes seems like something that ought to be fixed for other reasons. -"""] +"""]] -- 2.30.2