From 086cb30eb14e77e8619910434ef6e59bbb7f7113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:16:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...ent_1_b2060ec194e3ae53bd286f2bae799984._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/wishlist__58___generic_annex.cost-command/comment_1_b2060ec194e3ae53bd286f2bae799984._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist__58___generic_annex.cost-command/comment_1_b2060ec194e3ae53bd286f2bae799984._comment b/doc/todo/wishlist__58___generic_annex.cost-command/comment_1_b2060ec194e3ae53bd286f2bae799984._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d4d212b1d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/wishlist__58___generic_annex.cost-command/comment_1_b2060ec194e3ae53bd286f2bae799984._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2023-01-16T18:11:25Z" + content=""" +Then remote.name.annex-cost-command and annex.cost-command would not be +able to be set to the same value with the same result. That is an asymmetry +that no other pair of remote.name.foo and annex.foo have. + +I think it's better to avoid such asymmetry. + +(Also the idea of different costs for different files is right out, +that would make it sloooow.) +"""]] -- 2.30.2