From 060f7037e3f61479b2603a8ff364d465d2c0ee64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kyle Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:30:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...omment_15_994e3e64184a020f9afe21cd9ea34b38._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Get_annex.dotfiles__61__true_behavior_without_persistent_configuration__63__/comment_15_994e3e64184a020f9afe21cd9ea34b38._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Get_annex.dotfiles__61__true_behavior_without_persistent_configuration__63__/comment_15_994e3e64184a020f9afe21cd9ea34b38._comment b/doc/forum/Get_annex.dotfiles__61__true_behavior_without_persistent_configuration__63__/comment_15_994e3e64184a020f9afe21cd9ea34b38._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..1ca5856eac --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Get_annex.dotfiles__61__true_behavior_without_persistent_configuration__63__/comment_15_994e3e64184a020f9afe21cd9ea34b38._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="kyle" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/7d6e85cde1422ad60607c87fa87c63f3" + subject="comment 15" + date="2020-03-10T19:30:50Z" + content=""" +> If there's no obvious solution, I can probably just re-create the entire datalad dataset from scratch with the new software versions in this conda env. + +It's not obvious to me why an uninstalled subdataset would be causing issues with the repo upgrade process. Quickly trying, I can't trigger an issue, but perhaps the submodule got into some weird, not-really-removed state. You can open an issue on DataLad's side and we can try to debug it, though doing so might be tricky without a recipe to trigger it. +"""]] -- 2.30.2