From 03658010c7531f31ccc8969f69dde12ab24829f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yarikoptic Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 00:49:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] initial thoughts --- doc/todo/be_able_to_refer_to_remotes_by_uuid.mdwn | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/be_able_to_refer_to_remotes_by_uuid.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/be_able_to_refer_to_remotes_by_uuid.mdwn b/doc/todo/be_able_to_refer_to_remotes_by_uuid.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..35c1d8cd9e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/be_able_to_refer_to_remotes_by_uuid.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +in light of https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1259 (conflicting remote names) I wondered if both initremote and enableremote (and probably others) should acquire ability to set/refer to remotes by their UUIDs instead of relying purely on name which is not guaranteed to be unique. + +[[!meta name=yoh]] -- 2.39.5