Joey Hess [Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:21:00 +0000 (13:21 -0400)]
jump right to v8, don't stop part way
* init --version: When the version given is one that automatically
upgrades to a newer version, use the newer version instead.
* Auto upgrades from older repo versions, like v5, now jump right to v8.
Joey Hess [Thu, 20 Feb 2020 21:18:59 +0000 (17:18 -0400)]
handle keys with extensions consistently in all locales
Fix some cases where handling of keys with extensions varied depending on
the locale.
A filename with a unicode extension would before generate a key with an
extension in a unicode locale, but not in LANG=C, because the extension
was not all alphanumeric. Also the the length of the extension could be
counted differently depending on the locale.
In a non-unicode locale, git-annex migrate would see that the extension
was not all alphanumeric and want to "upgrade" it. Now that doesn't happen.
As far as backwards compatability, this does mean that unicode
extensions are counted by the number of bytes, not number of characters.
So, if someone is using unicode extensions, they may find git-annex
stops using them when adding files, because their extensions are too
long. Keys already in their repo with the "too long" extensions will
still work though, so this only prevents adding the same content with
the same extension generating the same key. Documented this by
documenting that annex.maxextensionlength is a number of bytes.
Also, if a filename has an extension that is not valid utf-8 and the
locale is utf-8, the extension will be allowed now, and an old
git-annex, in the same locale would not, and would also want to
"upgrade" that.
Joey Hess [Thu, 20 Feb 2020 18:09:53 +0000 (14:09 -0400)]
Makefile: Support newer versions of cabal that use the new-build system.
Unfortunately, cabal puts the binary in a very complicated path
and does not provide any good way to get it out, leaving no good choice
except to use find.
It may be possible to use cabal (new-)install --symlink-bindir,
and ask it to symlink to pwd, but with my older version of cabal,
that does not work.
The stack branch will probably also break once it uses a newer cabal,
didn't try to deal with that.
It seemed that, at the time, receive.denyNonFastforwards=true, which is
the default in a repo created by git init --shared --bare (but not
without --shared), which the assistant did, caused problems syncing.
But even at the time the bug report showed an error message clearly
explaining that it was a non-fast-forward push being denied.
I tried it with the current version, and since git-annex sync pulls
from the bare repo and merges, it pushes a fast-forward. So there's no
failure to push. (There could be one if another push happened after the
pull, but you'd want it to fail then presumably.)
I'm not 100% sure what changed to make it not be a problem, but I know
I've seen this message in many circumstances and I can't ever recall it
having anything to do with any issue that prevented a push.
Based on doc/forum/non_fast_forward_error_with_git_annex_sync.mdwn,
which showed the problem when syncing from a direct mode repo,
and on doc/forum/receiving_indirect_renames_on_direct_repo___63__/comment_3_0246fff6c7c75f6be45bd257ec3872a5._comment
which seems to show the problem was actually a problem pulling,
I think there's a good chance that the problem actually involved direct
mode.
Joey Hess [Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:19:58 +0000 (15:19 -0400)]
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex
* Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed
content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you.
* Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with
git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo.
Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use
git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the
git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow.
When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override
it.
It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex
--push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I
don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that
such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that
there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use
your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling
and pushing.
A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled?
Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master.
If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent
exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that
were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict.
I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking
branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more
important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed
content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync
with it.
projects / git-annex.git / log