But worst, this commit broke the test suite massively. I don't understand how.
git-annex get was failing. Very weirdly, git-annex find in a fresh
clone of an annex repo, during autoinit, was displaying a side message
-- but side messages are disabled when running find.
Joey Hess [Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:56:12 +0000 (14:56 -0400)]
deal with .git pointer file in Git.CurrentRepo
This fixes the bug.
Note, it's only done when GIT_DIR is set. When it's not set,
Git.Construct already handled it. This is why it was only noticed with this
git submodule command.
This commit was sponsored by Brett Eisenberg on Patreon.
Joey Hess [Fri, 23 Oct 2020 17:36:56 +0000 (13:36 -0400)]
pass --git-dir, rather than changing cwd
If .git is a gitlink file, setting cwd to it will fail, but --git-dir
will succeed. And this is the only place where it sets cwd when running
git, everywhere else already uses --git-dir.
Note that, git-annex's submodule fixup code usually converts gitlink
files to symlinks, so this wasn't usually problem. Still, worth fixing.
This commit was sponsored by Svenne Krap on Patreon.
Joey Hess [Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:37:09 +0000 (13:37 -0400)]
update chunk log after speculated chunks are verified to be present
Only done in checkPresentChunks, although retrieveChunks could also do
it. Does not seem necessary though, because git-annex never retrives
content without first checking if it's present AFAICR. And really this will
only be needed when using fsck. Puttting it here, rather than in fsck
avoids breaking an abstraction boundary, and is nice and inexpensive.
Joey Hess [Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:57:58 +0000 (12:57 -0400)]
speculatively use remote's configured chunk size as a fallback
When a special remote has chunking enabled, but no chunk sizes are
recorded (or the recorded ones are not found), speculatively try chunks
using the configured chunk size.
This makes eg, git-annex fsck --from remote be able to fix up the
location log of a file that the git-annex branch does not indicate is
stored on the remote.
Note that fsck does *not* fix up the chunk log to indicate the chunk
size. So, changing the chunk config of the remote after that will still
prevent accessing the chunks stored on it. Maybe fsck should, but I
wanted to start with this and see if it's needed.
Joey Hess [Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:31:56 +0000 (10:31 -0400)]
move: Improve resuming a move that was interrupted after the object was transferred
In cases where numcopies checks prevented the resumed move from dropping
the object from the source repository, it now relies on a log of recent
moves to replicate the behavior of the interrupted command.
Performance: Probably noticable impact, since it has to add to the log,
check the log, and remove from the log. Seems worth it to avoid this
annoying edge case. The log functions are pretty well optimised to avoid
unncessary work.
An performance improvement to make later would be to avoid cleanup doing
anything if it's not written to the log file, and has confirmed that the
log file does not contain the log line.
This commit was sponsored by Jake Vosloo on Patreon.
Joey Hess [Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:13:49 +0000 (13:13 -0400)]
don't try to remove pre-commit-annex and post-update-annex-hooks
Those are not installed by git-annex but by the user, and so removal
will never find the default content, and so if the user did install
them, it would display a misleading message.
Seems better, since the user installed them, to let the user remove them
if they want to.
Joey Hess [Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:14:01 +0000 (11:14 -0400)]
switch to Haskell2010
When I put in Haskell98 this spring, I was under the mistaken
apprehension that ghc defaulted to that. But it actually its default
is a third mode, which is closer to Haskell2010 but with some differences.
The manual says "By default, GHC mainly aims to behave (mostly) like a
Haskell 2010 compiler"
Fixed two cases where the Haskell98 do indentation flexability let
wrongly indented code build. That is one of the places where
ghc does not behave like Haskell2010 by default.
The other place that I think I was concerned about, is GHC manual
section 19.1.1.3. Expressions and patterns. But that only seems to
affect code using bottoms, so would only affect pure functions throwing
an error, which I don't think git-annex does in many places as it's
pretty horrid style. And it would only affect rare cases like shown in
that section. If it did happen, it would mean that the error was not
thrown before specifying Haskell98, and then was. Haskell2010 behaves
the same as Haskell98.
This commit was sponsored by Denis Dzyubenko on Patreon.
Joey Hess [Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:31:01 +0000 (16:31 -0400)]
Fix a memory leak introduced in the last release
The problem was this line:
cleanup = and <$> sequence (map snd v)
That caused all of v to be held onto until the end, when the cleanup action
was run.
I could not seem to find a bang pattern that avoided the leak, so I
resorted to a IORef, rather clunky, but not a performance problem because
it will only be written once per git ls-files, so typically just 1 time.
This commit was sponsored by Mark Reidenbach on Patreon.
projects / git-annex.git / log