From: Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:29:32 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: comment
X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/10.20250416-2+rpi1~1^2~60^2~129
X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fd5f082fbce6e99d7f456926425b64df93e454bd;p=git-annex.git

comment
---

diff --git a/doc/bugs/blake3_hash_support/comment_2_7be0932328ba4f49c33b0ab14429a283._comment b/doc/bugs/blake3_hash_support/comment_2_7be0932328ba4f49c33b0ab14429a283._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e4bbda8c59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/blake3_hash_support/comment_2_7be0932328ba4f49c33b0ab14429a283._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 2"""
+ date="2022-12-12T16:22:17Z"
+ content="""
+Thanks for the patch.
+
+I do think it would make sense to include "256" in the name of the backend,
+unless BLAKE3 recommends against using other lengths for some good reason.
+
+As for accepting this patch, the added dependency makes it harder. This
+would require distributions like Debian add the blake3 package. If
+cryptonite included it, that would be much easier -- though it would still 
+need ifdefs to support the old versions of crytonite for some time.
+
+Going the current route with adding a blake3 depdenency would need to start
+with it as a build flag..
+"""]]