From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 02:53:02 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: ; Improve comment from last change
X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/1%30.1+1-3+rpi1^2~2^2~20^2~330
X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f5451b6a0668f4dc9992562b62ed37a199f1fdad;p=emacs.git

; Improve comment from last change
---

diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
index d1b2a1efe6e..0acc24042f8 100644
--- a/lisp/subr.el
+++ b/lisp/subr.el
@@ -2654,8 +2654,9 @@ are non-nil, then the result is the value of the last binding.
 Some Lisp programmers follow the convention that `and' and `and-let*'
 are for forms evaluated for return value, and `when' and `when-let*' are
 for forms evaluated for side-effect with returned values ignored."
-  ;; Document this convention here because it partially explains why we
-  ;; have both `when-let*' and `and-let*'.
+  ;; ^ Document this convention here because it explains why we have
+  ;;   both `when-let*' and `and-let*' (in addition to the additional
+  ;;   feature of `and-let*' when BODY is empty).
   (declare (indent 1) (debug if-let*))
   (let (res)
     (if varlist