From: Xiong Zhang Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:51:24 +0000 (+0200) Subject: hvmloader: use base instead of pci_mem_start for find_next_rmrr() X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/4.11.1-1+rpi1~1^2~66^2~1557 X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ecc607b1851bc27140090da4d6124fd00090ec2b;p=xen.git hvmloader: use base instead of pci_mem_start for find_next_rmrr() find_next_rmrr(base) is used to find the lowest RMRR ending above base but below 4G. Current method couldn't cover the following situation: a. two rmrr exist, small gap between them b. pci_mem_start and mem_resource.base is below the first rmrr.base c. find_next_rmrr(pci_mem_start) will find the first rmrr d. After aligning mem_resource.base to bar size, first_rmrr.end < new_base < second_rmrr.base and new_base + bar_sz > second_rmrr.base. So the new bar will overlap with the second rmrr and doesn't overlap with the first rmrr. But the next_rmrr point to the first rmrr, then check_overlap() couldn't find the overlap. Finally assign a wrong address to bar. This patch using aligned new base to find the next rmrr, could fix the above case and find all the overlapped rmrr with new base. Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich --- diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c index 4eb1a31733..9543e5aaf2 100644 --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c @@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ void pci_setup(void) uint32_t vga_devfn = 256; uint16_t class, vendor_id, device_id; unsigned int bar, pin, link, isa_irq; - int next_rmrr; /* Resources assignable to PCI devices via BARs. */ struct resource { @@ -403,8 +402,6 @@ void pci_setup(void) io_resource.base = 0xc000; io_resource.max = 0x10000; - next_rmrr = find_next_rmrr(pci_mem_start); - /* Assign iomem and ioport resources in descending order of size. */ for ( i = 0; i < nr_bars; i++ ) { @@ -462,15 +459,20 @@ void pci_setup(void) base = (resource->base + bar_sz - 1) & ~(uint64_t)(bar_sz - 1); /* If we're using mem_resource, check for RMRR conflicts. */ - while ( resource == &mem_resource && - next_rmrr >= 0 && - check_overlap(base, bar_sz, + if ( resource == &mem_resource) + { + int next_rmrr = find_next_rmrr(base); + + while ( next_rmrr >= 0 && + check_overlap(base, bar_sz, memory_map.map[next_rmrr].addr, memory_map.map[next_rmrr].size) ) - { - base = memory_map.map[next_rmrr].addr + memory_map.map[next_rmrr].size; - base = (base + bar_sz - 1) & ~(bar_sz - 1); - next_rmrr = find_next_rmrr(base); + { + base = memory_map.map[next_rmrr].addr + + memory_map.map[next_rmrr].size; + base = (base + bar_sz - 1) & ~(bar_sz - 1); + next_rmrr = find_next_rmrr(base); + } } bar_data |= (uint32_t)base;