From: Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:02:41 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: comment
X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/10.20250416-2+rpi1~1^2~36^2~75
X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b00200c73cb374e08d6908c927d692f4c39330b5;p=git-annex.git

comment
---

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Changing_sync_to_include_content_breaks_UX/comment_14_08f3c3d26d13fd44ae9c26791b90a8fc._comment b/doc/bugs/Changing_sync_to_include_content_breaks_UX/comment_14_08f3c3d26d13fd44ae9c26791b90a8fc._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f40ea41eec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Changing_sync_to_include_content_breaks_UX/comment_14_08f3c3d26d13fd44ae9c26791b90a8fc._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 14"""
+ date="2023-07-14T00:01:27Z"
+ content="""
+> From the outside, it feels like the git-annex assistant functionality is
+> now the dominant use case which is guiding the development changes.
+
+Based on what, the changes in the last release?
+
+You're seeing a pattern where none exists.
+
+> (And that's understandable if it's most/all of your funding to work on the project.)
+
+No such funding, not that I allow funding to determine overall direction of
+this project.
+"""]]