From: Jan Beulich Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:42:42 +0000 (+0200) Subject: x86/AMD: distinguish compute units from hyper-threads X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/4.14.0+80-gd101b417b7-1+rpi1^2~63^2~3581 X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9429b07a0af7f92a5f25e4068e11db881e157495;p=xen.git x86/AMD: distinguish compute units from hyper-threads Fam17 replaces CUs by HTs, which we should reflect accordingly, even if the difference is not very big. The most relevant change (requiring some code restructuring) is that the topoext feature no longer means there is a valid CU ID. Take the opportunity and convert wrongly plain int variables in set_cpu_sibling_map() to unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Brian Woods Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné Acked-by: Andrew Cooper --- diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c index bad5b43628..a7afa2fa7a 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c @@ -504,17 +504,23 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx; cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); - c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xFF; c->x86_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0x3) + 1; + + if (c->x86 < 0x17) + c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xFF; + else { + c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xFF; + c->x86_max_cores /= c->x86_num_siblings; + } } if (opt_cpu_info) printk("CPU %d(%d) -> Processor %d, %s %d\n", cpu, c->x86_max_cores, c->phys_proc_id, - cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) ? "Compute Unit" : - "Core", - cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) ? c->compute_unit_id : - c->cpu_core_id); + c->compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID ? "Compute Unit" + : "Core", + c->compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID ? c->compute_unit_id + : c->cpu_core_id); } static void early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c index d4478e6132..78ba73578a 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c @@ -234,33 +234,41 @@ static void link_thread_siblings(int cpu1, int cpu2) cpumask_set_cpu(cpu2, per_cpu(cpu_core_mask, cpu1)); } -static void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu) +static void set_cpu_sibling_map(unsigned int cpu) { - int i; + unsigned int i; struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data; cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_sibling_setup_map); cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, socket_cpumask[cpu_to_socket(cpu)]); + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_core_mask, cpu)); + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask, cpu)); if ( c[cpu].x86_num_siblings > 1 ) { for_each_cpu ( i, &cpu_sibling_setup_map ) { - if ( cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) ) { - if ( (c[cpu].phys_proc_id == c[i].phys_proc_id) && - (c[cpu].compute_unit_id == c[i].compute_unit_id) ) + if ( cpu == i || c[cpu].phys_proc_id != c[i].phys_proc_id ) + continue; + if ( c[cpu].compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID && + c[i].compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID ) + { + if ( c[cpu].compute_unit_id == c[i].compute_unit_id ) + link_thread_siblings(cpu, i); + } + else if ( c[cpu].cpu_core_id != XEN_INVALID_CORE_ID && + c[i].cpu_core_id != XEN_INVALID_CORE_ID ) + { + if ( c[cpu].cpu_core_id == c[i].cpu_core_id ) link_thread_siblings(cpu, i); - } else if ( (c[cpu].phys_proc_id == c[i].phys_proc_id) && - (c[cpu].cpu_core_id == c[i].cpu_core_id) ) { - link_thread_siblings(cpu, i); } + else + printk(XENLOG_WARNING + "CPU%u: unclear relationship with CPU%u\n", + cpu, i); } } - else - { - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask, cpu)); - } if ( c[cpu].x86_max_cores == 1 ) {