From: Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:53:57 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: comment
X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/10.20250416-2+rpi1~1^2~29^2~13
X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1d17e4ee165ea6516560b9a2d831c667e6e8aa38;p=git-annex.git

comment
---

diff --git a/doc/forum/sync_content_through_repo_that_wants_nothing/comment_3_e05a3e3d991617bb2b323b5572cd771e._comment b/doc/forum/sync_content_through_repo_that_wants_nothing/comment_3_e05a3e3d991617bb2b323b5572cd771e._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ddc96a55fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/sync_content_through_repo_that_wants_nothing/comment_3_e05a3e3d991617bb2b323b5572cd771e._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 3"""
+ date="2024-01-25T15:50:04Z"
+ content="""
+`not copies=2` might be sufficient in your situation.
+
+If you look at the preferred content expression for a transfer repository, it
+is:
+
+`not (inallgroup=client and copies=client:2) and ($client)`
+
+Where `$client` is a copy of the preferred content expressions of the client.
+
+There's no reason you can't write a preferred content expression that
+does the same thing for some other group of repositories.
+"""]]