From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:45:33 +0000 (-0400) Subject: comment X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/10.20250416-2+rpi1~2^2^2~69^2~27 X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0ec5919bbe5b920ee0014cb5be6e619bfa83327a;p=git-annex.git comment --- diff --git a/doc/bugs/__34__failed_to_send_content_to_remote__34__/comment_21_79ccde86a33f486b77857720d97185f3._comment b/doc/bugs/__34__failed_to_send_content_to_remote__34__/comment_21_79ccde86a33f486b77857720d97185f3._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fbcbdd6983 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/__34__failed_to_send_content_to_remote__34__/comment_21_79ccde86a33f486b77857720d97185f3._comment @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 21""" + date="2021-07-27T17:16:50Z" + content=""" +I don't think a strace will tell me anything now. + +Is this the same repository that this issue was regarding? + +If not, that does seem like the same problem so perhaps we could learn +something from that repository. + +Was this repository upgraded from git-annex repository format 7 to 8? +If so, I see one way this could have happened. That upgrade regenerates +the keys db, but does not add inode caches for annex objects. +"""]]