Added a comment
authoralejandro@2e9e229fdf45d44cd300a5681432552693d458ab <alejandro@web>
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 08:29:09 +0000 (08:29 +0000)
committeradmin <admin@branchable.com>
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 08:29:09 +0000 (08:29 +0000)
doc/forum/Modus_operandi_for_local_full_backup/comment_2_fc2ac75608e91018f67c3753e9b09f76._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/forum/Modus_operandi_for_local_full_backup/comment_2_fc2ac75608e91018f67c3753e9b09f76._comment b/doc/forum/Modus_operandi_for_local_full_backup/comment_2_fc2ac75608e91018f67c3753e9b09f76._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5556f66
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="alejandro@2e9e229fdf45d44cd300a5681432552693d458ab"
+ nickname="alejandro"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2015-11-11T08:29:09Z"
+ content="""
+Hi anarcat, if I understand you correctly you're using method 4) in my original post. That is, having the source of backups as a git annex repo. However, all my readings on this site seem to indicate poor interaction with nested git repositories, that I would have. Isn't that so?
+"""]]