removed

diff --git a/doc/forum/avoiding_copies_across_mutiple_file_systems/comment_4_0ec29d6dc52238420dd8cf260ff14561._comment b/doc/forum/avoiding_copies_across_mutiple_file_systems/comment_4_0ec29d6dc52238420dd8cf260ff14561._comment
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 15e17e0..0000000
--- a/doc/forum/avoiding_copies_across_mutiple_file_systems/comment_4_0ec29d6dc52238420dd8cf260ff14561._comment
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-[[!comment format=mdwn
- username="https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/esgf-idp/openid/tom_clune"
- nickname="tom_clune"
- avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/ab2fcb3663856220387ef216fa46d9717513d750fd9ee5a3504c4c7b560ad96e"
- subject="comment 4"
- date="2021-05-12T16:41:27Z"
- content="""
-Sorry for the delay in responding.   I had a short vacation and jury duty that kept me from responding immediately.
-
-The symlink approach suggested by @Lukey appears to work quite well from my limited testing this far.       The git-worktree approach unfortunately required additional write permissions (as noted by @Joey) in the primary repository, and is thus not our preferred approach.
-
-As far as the performance consequences to the symlink option, my tests thus far did not show any obvious performance consequences related to multi-filesystem involvement.   Certainly my test repo (~100 files of 50 MB each) seemed to perform quite well, so a real test may effectively require deploying the full data set in this manner.
-
-I had previously tried @Joey's suggestion of symlinking just .git/annex rather than .git/annex/objects.     My recollection is that I got error messages, but will test again shortly.
-
-"""]]