thought

diff --git a/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn b/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn
index a0d08914b4d1d6cb4c890c2954eedd655c78cd28..b21c4c626464bb2a63abbedc9c006a4130a5b4df 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn
@@ -18,3 +18,9 @@ the old names when unmangeling (in dirFromViewedFile). Perhaps something
 additional could be recorded when entering a view branch that indicates what
 kind of name mangling was used, so it doesn't have to try both.
 --[[Joey]]
+
+> When several files are in a deep directory tree like `foo/bar/baz`, 
+> that would be an annoying common prefix to deal with, which the current
+> mangling avoids. So perhaps keeping it postfix is still a good idea, but
+> it could still use the psdudoslash. Eg, `somefile@foo/bar/baz.ext`?
+> --[[Joey]]