with new ghc 8.4.3, the armel situation seems to have improved,

apply this patch unconditionally.
===================================================================

Gbp-Pq: Name llvm-arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi.patch

diff --git a/llvm-targets b/llvm-targets
index 2537ecea7d3f5b6025af15b5a9931000a382aafa..5553da080ee5dc5639aae7f5ea0bae282e02cc68 100644 (file)
--- a/llvm-targets
+++ b/llvm-targets
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 ,("x86_64-unknown-windows", ("e-m:w-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128", "x86-64", ""))
 ,("arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf", ("e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64", "arm1176jzf-s", "+strict-align"))
 ,("armv6-unknown-linux-gnueabihf", ("e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64", "arm1136jf-s", "+strict-align"))
+,("arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi", ("e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64", "arm7tdmi", "+soft-float -fp-only-sp -d16 -vfp2 -vfp3 -fp16 -vfp4 -fp-armv8 -neon -crypto +strict-align"))
 ,("armv6l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf", ("e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64", "arm1176jzf-s", "+strict-align"))
 ,("armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf", ("e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64", "generic", ""))
 ,("armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabi", ("e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64", "generic", ""))