comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:36:08 +0000 (13:36 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:36:08 +0000 (13:36 -0400)
doc/todo/copy_with_both_--to_and_--from_/comment_2_7db9f62f5aa3640d1f4aeeb599e02e7c._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/todo/copy_with_both_--to_and_--from_/comment_2_7db9f62f5aa3640d1f4aeeb599e02e7c._comment b/doc/todo/copy_with_both_--to_and_--from_/comment_2_7db9f62f5aa3640d1f4aeeb599e02e7c._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..252c09c
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 2"""
+ date="2023-01-16T17:02:37Z"
+ content="""
+See [[todo/transitive_transfers]] for past discussion of this kind of
+feature (and why supporting streaming would complicate git-annex significantly
+for typically little gain).
+
+The extra commits to the git-annex branch can be avoided by
+annex.alwayscommit=false
+
+I wonder to what extent alternating getting a file with sending it on
+(and dropping it) would meet the use case? Are some files so large a single
+file cannot fit in local storage at all?
+"""]]