comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:53:25 +0000 (11:53 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:53:25 +0000 (11:53 -0400)
doc/bugs/significant_performance_regression_impacting_datal/comment_3_d30a515103d04fd966aadee7f141aeee._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/significant_performance_regression_impacting_datal/comment_3_d30a515103d04fd966aadee7f141aeee._comment b/doc/bugs/significant_performance_regression_impacting_datal/comment_3_d30a515103d04fd966aadee7f141aeee._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e59b347
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 3"""
+ date="2021-06-07T15:49:51Z"
+ content="""
+Also worth saying: When I have a choice between a bug fix and a performance
+change, I kind of have to pick the bug fix.
+[[bugs/indeterminite_preferred_content_state_for_duplicated_file]] was a
+longstanding bug that could cause *very* expensive misbehavior. The only
+way to fix it that would not have an on performance would be to
+remove include= and exclude= from the preferred content expression syntax,
+which would prevent a lot of current uses of preferred content.
+"""]]