comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:54:54 +0000 (13:54 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:54:54 +0000 (13:54 -0400)
doc/bugs/tls__58___peer_does_not_support_Extended_Main_Secret/comment_3_88789e5ee89a6229d1b4e31ecbc1a4a3._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/tls__58___peer_does_not_support_Extended_Main_Secret/comment_3_88789e5ee89a6229d1b4e31ecbc1a4a3._comment b/doc/bugs/tls__58___peer_does_not_support_Extended_Main_Secret/comment_3_88789e5ee89a6229d1b4e31ecbc1a4a3._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a148346
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 3"""
+ date="2024-10-22T17:39:17Z"
+ content="""
+git-annex builds with stack have used tls-2.0.x since August. I think many
+other builds are still using older tls from before this change, eg Debian
+is still on tls-1.8.0.
+
+So it's possible that more outdated servers will be causing problems as
+things continue to upgrade. It seems worth leaving this bug open for now.
+
+Also it seems pretty clear that TLS 1.2 without EMS is insecure, but I
+don't know if the insecurity is of a kind that is likely to affect
+git-annex users. Bearing in mind that git-annex can be used to upload
+sensitive information to HTTP servers, caution is warrented.
+"""]]