comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:20:42 +0000 (10:20 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:20:42 +0000 (10:20 -0400)
doc/forum/Does___96__fsck_--more__96___imply___96__--incremental__96____63__/comment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/forum/Does___96__fsck_--more__96___imply___96__--incremental__96____63__/comment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment b/doc/forum/Does___96__fsck_--more__96___imply___96__--incremental__96____63__/comment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ffab739
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 1"""
+ date="2025-03-26T14:18:02Z"
+ content="""
+No, interrupting will never lose previous incremental progress. In fact, if
+you interrupt `--more` and run the same command again, it will skip all
+files that were recorded as checked already by the first `--more`.
+
+I suspect you were reading a previous version of the man page, which
+discussed being interrupted under `--incremental`. That wording was
+recently adjusted.
+"""]]