[PATCH] Use the sps from the image

(as e.g mc_chroma is using the sps to determine
picture properties, like pic_width_in_luma_samples
and pic_height_in_luma_samples, I *think* this is
more correct.

This PR is for discussion. (See #345.)
It makes the failures go away, but that does not mean it's correct :)

The following poc will be stop failing if (only) this
patch is applied:

 - poc2  #336 - CVE-2022-43238
 - poc4  #338 - CVE-2022-43241
 - poc6-1, poc6-2 #340 - CVE-2022-43242
 - poc7-1, poc7-2  #341 - CVE-2022-43239
 - poc8-1 #342 - CVE-2022-43244
 - poc9-3 #343 - CVE-2022-43236
 - poc10-2, poc10-3 #344 - CVE-2022-43237
 - poc16 #350
 - poc19 #353

The following are still failing if only this patch is
applied, but they stop failing if #365 is applied as well, but will
still fail with ONLY #365 applied (IOW, both are needed)

 - poc1  #335 - CVE-2022-43240
 - poc3  #337 - CVE-2022-43235
 - poc5   #339 - CVE-2022-43423
 - poc9-1,poc9-2, poc9-4  #343 - CVE-2022-43236
 - poc14  #348 - CVE-2022-43253
 - poc15  #349 - CVE-2022-43248
 - poc17-1, poc17-2  #351
 - poc18 #352 - CVE-2022-43245

Gbp-Pq: Name use_sps_from_the_image.patch

diff --git a/libde265/motion.cc b/libde265/motion.cc
index b3790a01008e651e12a641901de6698b6e50edbc..8992a21d102755a5b4b7e0bd22d23df7442b09a0 100644 (file)
--- a/libde265/motion.cc
+++ b/libde265/motion.cc
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ void generate_inter_prediction_samples(base_context* ctx,
   int    stride[3];
 
   const pic_parameter_set* pps = shdr->pps.get();
-  const seq_parameter_set* sps = pps->sps.get();
+  const seq_parameter_set* sps = img->get_shared_sps().get();
 
   if (sps->BitDepth_Y != img->get_bit_depth(0) ||
       sps->BitDepth_C != img->get_bit_depth(1)) {