Added a comment
authoryarikoptic <yarikoptic@web>
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:33:29 +0000 (12:33 +0000)
committeradmin <admin@branchable.com>
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:33:29 +0000 (12:33 +0000)
doc/bugs/old__40__er__41___cp_from_coreutils_lacks_--reflink/comment_6_db5de257e8cfb468bf31d46065b7d251._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/old__40__er__41___cp_from_coreutils_lacks_--reflink/comment_6_db5de257e8cfb468bf31d46065b7d251._comment b/doc/bugs/old__40__er__41___cp_from_coreutils_lacks_--reflink/comment_6_db5de257e8cfb468bf31d46065b7d251._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3ef5e30
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="yarikoptic"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
+ subject="comment 6"
+ date="2020-10-20T12:33:29Z"
+ content="""
+> --reflink seems unlikely to do anything useful on windows even if the option is supported, so it could just be defaulted to not supported on windows. 
+
+yeap, sounds good to me ATM.
+
+> -a/-p/--preserve-timestamps are more important and also probed at build time.
+
+If I read NEWS correctly, it was added in 4.1.10, so old enough (was I even born then?) ;) 
+"""]]