comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:02:41 +0000 (20:02 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:02:41 +0000 (20:02 -0400)
doc/bugs/Changing_sync_to_include_content_breaks_UX/comment_14_08f3c3d26d13fd44ae9c26791b90a8fc._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Changing_sync_to_include_content_breaks_UX/comment_14_08f3c3d26d13fd44ae9c26791b90a8fc._comment b/doc/bugs/Changing_sync_to_include_content_breaks_UX/comment_14_08f3c3d26d13fd44ae9c26791b90a8fc._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f40ea41
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 14"""
+ date="2023-07-14T00:01:27Z"
+ content="""
+> From the outside, it feels like the git-annex assistant functionality is
+> now the dominant use case which is guiding the development changes.
+
+Based on what, the changes in the last release?
+
+You're seeing a pattern where none exists.
+
+> (And that's understandable if it's most/all of your funding to work on the project.)
+
+No such funding, not that I allow funding to determine overall direction of
+this project.
+"""]]