comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:03:12 +0000 (13:03 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:03:12 +0000 (13:03 -0400)
doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment b/doc/bugs/Add_support_for_skein512__95__256_hash/comment_1_7cebbecfc10c22fa58c5c1c97b9c6369._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8199cad
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 1"""
+ date="2016-10-31T16:54:30Z"
+ content="""
+What kind of performance benefit are we talking about here?
+
+It seems it would be a bit hard to implement this, since Backend.Hash uses
+a HashSize that is just an Int, which would have to be extended with the
+number of bits to use of a longer hash. Not hard hard but it will
+complicate the code.
+
+(Also, the name "SKEIN512_256" is pretty long itself to include in a
+filename.")
+"""]]