The usage of the __transparent__ attribute in
991033fa introduces some issues
when compiled with clang 3.8.0:
xen/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h:605:15: error: transparent_union attribute can only be
applied to a union definition; attribute ignored [-Werror,-Wignored-attributes]
typedef union __transparent__ ept_qual {
^
xen/include/xen/compiler.h:50:44: note: expanded from macro '__transparent__'
This can be easily fixed by moving the attribute to the end of the definition,
but then the following error triggers:
xen/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h:607:5: error: size of field '' (16 bits) does not
match the size of the first field in transparent union; transparent_union attribute ignored
[-Werror,-Wignored-attributes]
struct {
^
xen/include/asm/hvm/vmx/vmx.h:606:19: note: size of first field is 64 bits
unsigned long raw;
^
Which can be fixed by introducing a new field in the nested structure that
contains the padding in order to match the size of an unsigned long.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
void vmx_pi_hooks_deassign(struct domain *d);
/* EPT violation qualifications definitions */
-typedef union __transparent__ ept_qual {
+typedef union ept_qual {
unsigned long raw;
struct {
bool read:1, write:1, fetch:1,
eff_read:1, eff_write:1, eff_exec:1, /* eff_user_exec */:1,
gla_valid:1,
gla_fault:1; /* Valid iff gla_valid. */
+ unsigned long /* pad */:55;
};
-} ept_qual_t;
+} __transparent__ ept_qual_t;
#define EPT_L4_PAGETABLE_SHIFT 39
#define EPT_PAGETABLE_ENTRIES 512