Added a comment
authorbpoldrack <bpoldrack@web>
Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:23:57 +0000 (14:23 +0000)
committeradmin <admin@branchable.com>
Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:23:57 +0000 (14:23 +0000)
doc/todo/use_copy__95__file__95__range_for_get_and_copy/comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/todo/use_copy__95__file__95__range_for_get_and_copy/comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment b/doc/todo/use_copy__95__file__95__range_for_get_and_copy/comment_2_85483ca3d6d913bc23f23e5faef278d4._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3e38807
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="bpoldrack"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/8e929a6e60f16f50e7463f88aab26f40"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2025-03-05T14:23:56Z"
+ content="""
+The problem is indeed specific to the combination of NFS and ZFS.
+Not sure how to properly probe for that. But since this is relevant only for copies across ZFS over NFS4.2 mounts, a config option would be OK, I think. It's not that something isn't working w/o it, it's just unnecessarily slow.
+"""]]