[3/5] tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils
authorAndres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0000 (14:25 -0700)
committerSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:11:48 +0000 (19:11 +0100)
Origin: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220703212551.1114923-4-andres@anarazel.de/

binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
compilation failures for tools/perf/util/annotate.c, e.g. on debian
unstable. Relevant binutils commit:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=60a3da00bd5407f07

Wire up the feature test and switch to init_disassemble_info_compat(),
which were introduced in prior commits, fixing the compilation failure.

I verified that perf can still disassemble bpf programs by using bpftrace
under load, recording a perf trace, and then annotating the bpf "function"
with and without the changes. With old binutils there's no change in output
before/after this patch. When comparing the output from old binutils (2.35)
to new bintuils with the patch (upstream snapshot) there are a few output
differences, but they are unrelated to this patch. An example hunk is:

     1.15 :   55:mov    %rbp,%rdx
     0.00 :   58:add    $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdx
     0.00 :   5c:xor    %ecx,%ecx
-    1.03 :   5e:callq  0xffffffffe12aca3c
+    1.03 :   5e:call   0xffffffffe12aca3c
     0.00 :   63:xor    %eax,%eax
-    2.18 :   65:leaveq
-    2.82 :   66:retq
+    2.18 :   65:leave
+    2.82 :   66:ret

Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622181918.ykrs5rsnmx3og4sv@alap3.anarazel.de
Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Gbp-Pq: Topic bugfix/all
Gbp-Pq: Name tools-perf-fix-compilation-error-with-new-binutils.patch

tools/perf/Makefile.config
tools/perf/util/annotate.c

index 328c489f04e1ffb20a1768443a6150d5ee74e14c..8517195b690cc4c3af3e1de234f3c48e95d6b47f 100644 (file)
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libpython := $(PYTHON_EMBED_LDOPTS)
 FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libaio = -lrt
 
 FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-four-args = -lbfd -lopcodes -ldl
+FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-init-styled = -lbfd -lopcodes -ldl
 
 CORE_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer
 CORE_CFLAGS += -ggdb3
@@ -877,13 +878,16 @@ ifndef NO_LIBBFD
     ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-liberty), 1)
       EXTLIBS += -lbfd -lopcodes -liberty
       FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-four-args += -liberty -ldl
+      FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-init-styled += -liberty -ldl
     else
       ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-liberty-z), 1)
         EXTLIBS += -lbfd -lopcodes -liberty -lz
         FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-four-args += -liberty -lz -ldl
+        FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-init-styled += -liberty -lz -ldl
       endif
     endif
     $(call feature_check,disassembler-four-args)
+    $(call feature_check,disassembler-init-styled)
   endif
 
   ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-buildid), 1)
@@ -997,6 +1001,10 @@ ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-four-args), 1)
     CFLAGS += -DDISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE
 endif
 
+ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-init-styled), 1)
+    CFLAGS += -DDISASM_INIT_STYLED
+endif
+
 ifeq (${IS_64_BIT}, 1)
   ifndef NO_PERF_READ_VDSO32
     $(call feature_check,compile-32)
index 82cc396ef516c45c75163538502ecdcba94b7d74..daea1867381db2f6659fc91342f9d6d1f30b5117 100644 (file)
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <subcmd/parse-options.h>
 #include <subcmd/run-command.h>
+#include <tools/dis-asm-compat.h>
 
 /* FIXME: For the HE_COLORSET */
 #include "ui/browser.h"
@@ -1762,9 +1763,9 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
                ret = errno;
                goto out;
        }
-       init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
-                             (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
-
+       init_disassemble_info_compat(&info, s,
+                                    (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
+                                    fprintf_styled);
        info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
        info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);