+++ /dev/null
-Have tested this setup locally - and it seems to work well.<br>
-Asking for a sanity check:<br>
-<br>
-One default repo.<br>
-One .thin repo.<br>
-Synching using sync and get.<br>
-<br>
-The fat repo retains all the historical versions of the file. <br>
-The thin repo holds only the newest version of the file. <br>
-<br>
-Can edit / sync both ways and the above two statements remain true.<br>
-<br>
-<br>
-Is this use case intended?<br>
-If so git-annex is brilliant =).<br>
--- /dev/null
+Have tested this setup locally - and it seems to work well.<br>
+Asking for a sanity check:<br>
+<br>
+One default repo.<br>
+One .thin repo.<br>
+Synching using sync and get.<br>
+<br>
+The fat repo retains all the historical versions of the file. <br>
+The thin repo holds only the newest version of the file. <br>
+<br>
+Can edit / sync both ways and the above two statements remain true.<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+Is this use case intended?<br>
+If so git-annex is brilliant =).<br>