On Huang Ying's machine:
erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj)
but Yinghai reported that on his machine,
erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj) -
sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)
To make erst table size checking code works on all systems, both
testing are treated as PASS.
Same situation applies to einj_tab->header_length, so corresponding
table size checking is changed in similar way too.
Originally-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
- use switch() for better readability
- add comment explaining why a formally invalid size it also being
accepted
- check erst_tab->header.length before even looking at
erst_tab->header_length
- prefer sizeof(*erst_tab) over sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst)
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Committed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
static int __init erst_check_table(struct acpi_table_erst *erst_tab)
{
- if (erst_tab->header_length != sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst))
+ if (erst_tab->header.length < sizeof(*erst_tab))
return -EINVAL;
- if (erst_tab->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst))
+
+ switch (erst_tab->header_length) {
+ case sizeof(*erst_tab) - sizeof(erst_tab->header):
+ /*
+ * While invalid per specification, there are (early?) systems
+ * indicating the full header size here, so accept that value too.
+ */
+ case sizeof(*erst_tab):
+ break;
+ default:
return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (erst_tab->entries !=
- (erst_tab->header.length - sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst)) /
+ (erst_tab->header.length - sizeof(*erst_tab)) /
sizeof(struct acpi_erst_entry))
return -EINVAL;