remove warnings about tuning being experimental
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:27:25 +0000 (13:27 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:27:25 +0000 (13:27 -0400)
doc/tuning.mdwn
doc/tuning/comment_8_b6d4ce08b9c3b0f4baf29d0723ca83d4._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

index 45d0edd20c12f689edb472295022716b260be9fc..5850d7b8f9b47d251744cc3c6071d3b3df284892 100644 (file)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-git-annex now has experimental support for tuning a repository for
+git-annex now has support for tuning a repository for
 different work loads. 
 
 For example, a repository with a very large number of files in it may work
@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ prevent merging their git-annex branches together, but it cannot prevent
 `git merge remote/master` merging two branches, and the result will be ugly
 at best (`git annex fix` can fix up the mess somewhat).
 
-Again, tuned repositories are an experimental feature; use with caution!
-
 The following tuning parameters are available:
 
 * `annex.tune.objecthash1=true`  
diff --git a/doc/tuning/comment_8_b6d4ce08b9c3b0f4baf29d0723ca83d4._comment b/doc/tuning/comment_8_b6d4ce08b9c3b0f4baf29d0723ca83d4._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..18467f2
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""Re: Still experimental?"""
+ date="2024-10-22T17:26:55Z"
+ content="""
+Tuning is not experimental for some time, I've removed the warnings.
+"""]]