comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:48:37 +0000 (11:48 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:48:37 +0000 (11:48 -0400)
doc/todo/Add_annex.orig-uuid_config_for___39__ephemeral_clones__39__/comment_2_2debe0cb11763f0673255cfd7f764815._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/todo/Add_annex.orig-uuid_config_for___39__ephemeral_clones__39__/comment_2_2debe0cb11763f0673255cfd7f764815._comment b/doc/todo/Add_annex.orig-uuid_config_for___39__ephemeral_clones__39__/comment_2_2debe0cb11763f0673255cfd7f764815._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..764d477
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 2"""
+ date="2023-03-10T15:43:58Z"
+ content="""
+Is there any reason you don't initialize the clone with the same uuid as
+the parent remote? That seems to me like it would make sense, since they
+*are* the same git-annex repository.
+
+Can you refresh my memory of where we discussed this --reckless=ephemeral
+hack? I can't find it discussed by that name anywhere in git-annex or mail
+mail archives. Just want to understand the motivation of doing that,
+and why other approaches were not considered.
+"""]]