Previously, When the first link configures rules, it removes all saved
rules, which were configured by networkd previously, in the foreign rule
database, but the rules themselves are still in the database.
Thus, when the second or later link configures rules, it errnously
treats the rules already exist.
This is the root of issue #11280.
This removes rules from the foreign database when they are removed.
Fixes #11280.
(cherry picked from commit
92cd00b9749141907a1110044cc7d1f01caff545)
Gbp-Pq: Name network-remove-routing-policy-rule-from-foreign-rule-data.patch
SET_FOREACH(rule, m->rules_saved, i) {
existing = set_get(m->rules_foreign, rule);
- if (existing) {
+ if (!existing)
+ continue; /* Saved rule does not exist anymore. */
- r = routing_policy_rule_remove(rule, link, NULL);
- if (r < 0) {
- log_warning_errno(r, "Could not remove routing policy rules: %m");
- continue;
- }
-
- link->routing_policy_rule_remove_messages++;
+ r = routing_policy_rule_remove(existing, link, NULL);
+ if (r < 0) {
+ log_warning_errno(r, "Could not remove routing policy rules: %m");
+ continue;
}
+
+ link->routing_policy_rule_remove_messages++;
+
+ assert_se(set_remove(m->rules_foreign, existing) == existing);
+ routing_policy_rule_free(existing);
}
}