comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:16:18 +0000 (17:16 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:16:18 +0000 (17:16 -0400)
doc/bugs/webapp_--listen_port_is_not_used__63__/comment_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/webapp_--listen_port_is_not_used__63__/comment_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment b/doc/bugs/webapp_--listen_port_is_not_used__63__/comment_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d1bd57f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 3"""
+ date="2024-01-18T21:13:42Z"
+ content="""
+IPv6 would beg to differ about `:\d+` ;-)
+
+Actually, it may be that your address:port was treated as some IPv6 mixed
+IPv4, iirc something like that is a thing.
+
+> it was to have some static port I could keep an ssh redirect pointing to so I could investigate behavior of the remote running annex webapp.
+
+You would still need to copy over the url though to get the access key
+for the webapp..
+"""]]