comment

diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_commit_smudges_unncessarily/comment_2_5b230c4b74da48099e8be0e264bbf3e6._comment b/doc/bugs/git_commit_smudges_unncessarily/comment_2_5b230c4b74da48099e8be0e264bbf3e6._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1e61d62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/git_commit_smudges_unncessarily/comment_2_5b230c4b74da48099e8be0e264bbf3e6._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 2"""
+ date="2021-11-09T20:03:33Z"
+ content="""
+While I still need to investigate if there is really a reversion here,
+it's worth noting that you can probably avoid the slow speed by running:
+
+git config filter.annex.process 'git-annex filter-process'
+
+That needs a current daily build of git-annex, the feature will also be in
+the next release.
+"""]]

diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_641__an_alternative_smudge_filter/comment_4_b2a0a8f646197ce1826bc2e6859139b1._comment b/doc/devblog/day_641__an_alternative_smudge_filter/comment_4_b2a0a8f646197ce1826bc2e6859139b1._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..661fd62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/devblog/day_641__an_alternative_smudge_filter/comment_4_b2a0a8f646197ce1826bc2e6859139b1._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 4"""
+ date="2021-11-09T19:53:38Z"
+ content="""
+Right, annex.supportunlocked avoids all these performance considerations.
+
+But, it seems possible that enabling filter-process will speed it up enough
+to not need annex.supportunlocked. I'd be interested to know if that works
+for you.
+"""]]

diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_642__cost_model/comment_2_5bb7a20dd3141423ce4109d8fd4098c4._comment b/doc/devblog/day_642__cost_model/comment_2_5bb7a20dd3141423ce4109d8fd4098c4._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..53d5450
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/devblog/day_642__cost_model/comment_2_5bb7a20dd3141423ce4109d8fd4098c4._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 2"""
+ date="2021-11-09T19:55:51Z"
+ content="""
+Thanks @jkniiv, that's good to hear. That is exactly the results I would
+have hoped for for a repository like yours. To speed up the checkout
+of the annexed files in your case will need improvements to git,
+probably. But the crucial thing is it's not gotten worse, and the other
+checkout improved a lot.
+
+I would be curious how you find `git add`'s performance now, if you ever
+use that to add large annexed files.
+"""]]