Added a comment
authoredward <edward@web>
Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:43:31 +0000 (17:43 +0000)
committeradmin <admin@branchable.com>
Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:43:31 +0000 (17:43 +0000)
doc/bugs/unlock_should_warn_if_file_isn__39__t_in_repo/comment_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/unlock_should_warn_if_file_isn__39__t_in_repo/comment_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment b/doc/bugs/unlock_should_warn_if_file_isn__39__t_in_repo/comment_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8f34197
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="edward"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/1e64ab07e0faced09520a5c589deb70b"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2016-11-07T17:43:31Z"
+ content="""
+I see your point, feel free to close this bug.
+
+There is a way for git-annex to tell that the file is probably meant to be part of the repo because it is a symlink, it doesn't look the same as a new file.
+
+    ~/scratch/annex/bar (master)$ ls -l
+    total 4
+    lrwxrwxrwx 1 edward edward 181 Nov  4 18:02 test -> ../.git/annex/objects/w8/pv/SHA256E-s5--f2ca1bb6c7e907d06dafe4687e579fce76b37e4e93b7605022da52e6ccc26fd2/SHA256E-s5--f2ca1bb6c7e907d06dafe4687e579fce76b37e4e93b7605022da52e6ccc26fd2
+    ~/scratch/annex/bar (master)$ 
+"""]]