libcxx-test-fix-lockfree-test-for-i386
authorLLVM Packaging Team <pkg-llvm-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:50:21 +0000 (12:50 +0000)
committerSylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>
Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:50:21 +0000 (12:50 +0000)
Lock is_always_lock free test fails on i386 because std::atomic is aligned
to 8 bytes while long long is aligned to 4 bytes. clang can't generate inline
code for unaligned 8 byte atomics even tough instruction set and gcc support
it.

That makes it expected thaqt ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE and
std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free don't match on i386. Correct test
for std::atomic<long long> is to check if target cpu support cmpxchg8 instruction.
To set instruction support one can check __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_8 define.

Bug: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19355

Gbp-Pq: Topic libcxx
Gbp-Pq: Name libcxx-test-fix-lockfree-test-for-i386.patch

libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp

index 7a8d4c1f4a69db704b56e7a36ea96286d02d9fc6..5cd0e2d2c27324566aaef467af959134e89ebab1 100644 (file)
 # error Feature test macro missing.
 #endif
 
+#if defined(__i386__) && defined(__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_8)
+/* Fix for clang setting __GCC_ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE incorecctly for x86
+ * https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19355
+ */
+#undef ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE
+#define ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE 2
+#endif
+
 template <typename T> void checkAlwaysLockFree() {
   if (std::atomic<T>::is_always_lock_free)
     assert(std::atomic<T>().is_lock_free());