Added a comment
authorhttp://joeyh.name/ <joey@web>
Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:24:06 +0000 (21:24 +0000)
committeradmin <admin@branchable.com>
Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:24:06 +0000 (21:24 +0000)
doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment b/doc/special_remotes/bup/comment_7_cb1a0d3076e9d06e7a24204478f6fa98._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a2284c3
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 7"
+ date="2013-04-02T21:24:06Z"
+ content="""
+`bup-split` uses a git branch to name the objects stored in the bup repository. So it will be limited by any scalability issues affecting large numbers of git branches. I don't know what those are.
+
+Yes, it would be possible to make git-annex store this in the git-annex branch instead.
+"""]]