Added a comment
authorberyllium@5bc3c32eb8156390f96e363e4ba38976567425ec <beryllium@web>
Tue, 6 May 2025 07:24:51 +0000 (07:24 +0000)
committeradmin <admin@branchable.com>
Tue, 6 May 2025 07:24:51 +0000 (07:24 +0000)
doc/forum/whereused__58___--key_other_branches_w__47__o_checkout/comment_4_37e4328dbca4c499b2d3b1bb68b951e2._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/forum/whereused__58___--key_other_branches_w__47__o_checkout/comment_4_37e4328dbca4c499b2d3b1bb68b951e2._comment b/doc/forum/whereused__58___--key_other_branches_w__47__o_checkout/comment_4_37e4328dbca4c499b2d3b1bb68b951e2._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8a58e28
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="beryllium@5bc3c32eb8156390f96e363e4ba38976567425ec"
+ nickname="beryllium"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/62b67d68e918b381e7e9dd6a96c16137"
+ subject="comment 4"
+ date="2025-05-06T07:24:51Z"
+ content="""
+Thank you for the offer. I'm a little sheepish about it though.
+
+Because I'm mindful that my, perhaps over ambition, has knock on effects. eg. is what I am doing (with unrelated branches) breaking how unusued detects unused objects?
+
+If that is the case, I'd understand being consistent and not facilitating this hubris.
+
+"""]]