comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:45:33 +0000 (13:45 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:45:33 +0000 (13:45 -0400)
doc/bugs/__34__failed_to_send_content_to_remote__34__/comment_21_79ccde86a33f486b77857720d97185f3._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/__34__failed_to_send_content_to_remote__34__/comment_21_79ccde86a33f486b77857720d97185f3._comment b/doc/bugs/__34__failed_to_send_content_to_remote__34__/comment_21_79ccde86a33f486b77857720d97185f3._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..fbcbdd6
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 21"""
+ date="2021-07-27T17:16:50Z"
+ content="""
+I don't think a strace will tell me anything now.
+
+Is this the same repository that this issue was regarding?
+<https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/5613>
+If not, that does seem like the same problem so perhaps we could learn
+something from that repository.
+
+Was this repository upgraded from git-annex repository format 7 to 8?
+If so, I see one way this could have happened. That upgrade regenerates
+the keys db, but does not add inode caches for annex objects.
+"""]]